Monday, May 29, 2006

Immigration

In the early 1900s the Mexican American border was visa free. People came from Mexico to work in agriculture during the season and went back home. No visas, no problems.

What was wrong with that? We are not going to block terrorists when any of the plans for blocking illegal immigrants. What we need is to consider what's wrong with the folks coming her to help with our work? Particularly if we don't have enough of our own people to do it.

Maybe the complaint would be that they are willing to work for less than we are. How is that different than now where the illegals come here and work for less anyway.

What do you think?

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Islamic Prediction

Koran (9:11) - For it is written that a son of Arabia would awaken a fearsome Eagle.

The wrath of the Eagle would be felt throughout the lands of Allah and lo,

while some of the people trembled in despair still more rejoiced; for the wrath of the Eagle cleansed the lands of Allah;

and there was peace.


What a nice prediction!

Ben

Wh

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Osama Bin Laden

I've been thinking about our war on terror. We have a huge reward posted for Osama and yet have made no progress in taking him out. While his influence seems to diminish, he still is a powerful influence.

Maybe we are going at this wrong. How about inviting him to the negotiating table? He seems to want to influence the US people...what better way? I realize that we are more interested in taking him out than talking to him, but taking him out is not working. Regardless of the crimes he has committed against us, it doesn't hurt to talk with him because of his obvious stature in the Mid East.

If that fails, at least we know where he is.

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

Government Competence

So, now we have had FEMA at New Orleans and the Medicare Drug plan. It gives me no comfort that the same government that provides these is also fighting the war on terror.

Obviously, there is something fundamentally wrong here. It seems to not be dependent on the political party in power, except that one would hope they can recognize the the issues and do something about it. If not, we need to look for other political leadership.

I am hoping that blogging might have a positive effect on all this, so please provide your comments and invite others to join in.

Thanks...Ben.

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Think Clearly

Political Influence

Only rich people can afford to be politicians without contributions or party help.

After they are in office for several years, they lose touch with the electorate, for example:

1) Politicians generally have their own retirement

2) their own medical care

3) they make much more money than the average person

4) they send others to war, but don't send their kids or go themselves.

How can we change this so they stay in touch?

Thursday, January 19, 2006

Financing Politicians

The political process of selecting candidates should be more like a tournament.

Start at the lowest level, such as Congressional Districts. Limit the campaign to publishing a list of candidates and their information, financed by public funds. No other financing or advertising allowed. Select top candidates by vote and move them up to the next level. Continue this process to the top, eventually electing to the office. Do this for all from the lowest to highest elected officials.

This eliminates political fund raising, which many National politicians say takes over half of their time. The result: No legal influence buying, more time for the politician to do his job.

What do you think?

Jill Carroll - Hostage

There seem to be three choices:

1) Do not give in to terrorists and take what we get.

2) If she is murdered, execute all the women "terrorists" being held by the Coalition. Effective, but a response that would lower us to the level of the terrorists in Iraq.

3) Give in to the terrorist's demands, encouraging more atrocities.

All bad.